Term Vs. Whole Life Insurance

Life insurance as a risk mitigation element provides protection against casualties in life. The history of life insurance began with providing coverage for a particular period of time, and if the insured died during the period, the beneficiary got the death benefit. The disadvantage was that the period was limited, which led to the innovation of new products that gave death protection coverage for the entire life of the individual.
In term insurance, the increases during the time, as the chances of death are greater. The term policies include renewable, which means the policies can be renewed after the period with a higher ; decreasing in which coverage lessens each year; and convertible in which the can be converted to cash value after the period. In whole life, the remains constant for the entire life. Generally, the for the whole life is higher than that of term.
The for term increases to cover the cost of the insurance. Therefore, in the beginning, the is less and it increases thereafter. In whole life insurance, the is higher than the cost of the insurance in the beginning. This extra amount is kept as a cash value component, which is invested to get an annualized return of 5-6%. In the latter years, when cost is more than the , money is taken from the returns of the cash value component and the cost is recovered.
The benefit of term is that since the is less, the extra money can be prudently invested elsewhere to get a higher return by the individual. Whole life provides cash value, which can be used to borrow money to spend for other purposes such as education of children. There are many innovative policies that provide many features such as guaranteed returns and dividend payments.
Before deciding between term and whole life insurance, it is important to consider the financial resources and the objective of the insurance . It depends upon the age of the insured, his or her future needs and the number of dependents.

The New Way To Lower The Cost Of Health Insurance

It seems that every day there is an article about the rising cost of health insurance, the high number of people with no health insurance, and our system of financing medical care which is broken and needs repair or replacement.

What goes unreported is that since January 1, 2004 there is a new way to finance medical expenses which drastically reduces the cost of medical insurance when compared to traditional forms of health insurance. The name of this radical new approach to financing health care is: Health Accounts, or HSAs.

Health Accounts combine a health insurance plan that will pay medical expenses after a patient has paid a few thousand dollars for medical care. A unique feature of these high up-front (a “high deductible” in insurance-speak) medical insurance plans is that a patient can open up an IRA-like tax favored account to fund the deductible. When sick the patient can withdraw money from the Health Account without any tax penalty.

Like a rainy day fund, a person on an HSA puts money aside in his/her own account in addition to paying a health insurance premium for insurance that will pay when a catastrophe happens. The HSA-compatible medical insurance plans are less expensive than most other health insurance because they only begin to pay for treatment after a patient has incurred several thousand dollars worth of medical bills.

The combined cost of the low cost medical insurance plan and the HSA component are likely the same or less than the cost of a traditional health insurance plan which begins paying medical bills immediately. The big in HSA plans are threefold:

1) The money invested in the HSA vehicle stays in the pocket of the person until used to pay qualified medical expenses;

2) The money deposited into the HSA account is a deductible expense from Federal income taxes – also many states allow income tax deductibility for HSA contributions; and,

3) An person pays less for health insurance to an insurance company.

Most people only care about the cost of health insurance when they have to pay the premium (i.e., monthly payment for the insurance.) This applies to individuals and families who purchase their own policies and also companies which purchase health insurance on behalf of employees and their families. HSAs make the most sense for these people – since every dollar they save on premium stays in their pocket.

HSAs a unique feature to employers: they can partially or fully fund the HSA account for employees covered by a compatible health insurance plan. Employees can also make tax deductible contributions to their own HSA account – up to the maximum allowed by the IRS.

So, an employer who may save $150-$200 per month per employee could contribute $75-$100 pre month to an employees HSA account, get a tax deduction and still spend less money in total for health insurance than they would spend on a traditional health insurance plan for their employees.

The employees like this arrangement because any money deposited into their HSA account become theirs immediately (i.e., the vest immediately.) The immediate full vesting for the employees also helps those companies with no retirement accounts (e.g., 401k plan.)

Money in the HSA accounts can be used for non-medical expenses at age 65 with no tax penalty. Many employees see this as an opportunity to accumulate a lot of money for their retirement – assuming they stay healthy. If they become sick the money is there to pay for medical expenses.

HSAs – the new way to reduce the cost of financing medical care.